Marriage of F.M. and M.M. (2021)

Case
June 3, 2021
Description

Court erred by refusing to consider abuse occurring after the DVRO petition was filed; Court erred by denying DVRO based on lack of corroborating evidence for mother's testimony; Court erred by denying DVRO based on parties' separation - separation is not a substitute for RO protection and DVPA forbids considering separation; (fn. 5) Custody order violations that cut off parent's access to child may constitute abuse supporting DVRO

Was this resource helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!