Case
January 31, 2014
Description
Court erred by refusing to hold a hearing on DVPA spousal support unless it found in petitioner's favor on DVRO - request for spousal support is a separate issue from the RO; A single incident of violent conduct ("situational abuse") is sufficient basis for a DVRO; Language access issues in DVRO proceedings; Court did not err in denying DVRO on these facts; Judge's comments about "Christian" behavior of parties did not indicate that the judge considered irrelevant extraneous factors in his ruling
Was this resource helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!