Case
August 5, 2021
Description
Appellant forfeited substantial evidence challenge by failing to properly address the standard of review - opening brief was required to address both favorable and unfavorable evidence; Noting that no caselaw supports an argument that respondent's compliance with an RO weighs against renewal; Parties to an RO are collaterally estopped from challenging the findings of a DVRO in subsequent proceedings
Appeals & Writs
Courts & Hearings
Restraining Orders
Was this resource helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!