August 5, 2021      
      
        Description
        
      
                      Appellant forfeited substantial evidence challenge by failing to properly address the standard of review - opening brief was required to address both favorable and unfavorable evidence; Noting that no caselaw supports an argument that respondent's compliance with an RO weighs against renewal; Parties to an RO are collaterally estopped from challenging the findings of a DVRO in subsequent proceedings
              Appeals & Writs
            
            
          
              Courts & Hearings
            
            
          
              Restraining Orders
            
            
          Was this resource helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
			