Ritchie v. Konrad (2004)

Case
February 24, 2004
Description

DVRO renewals should be granted unless (1) the request is contested, and (2) the judge determines the protected party does not have a "reasonable apprehension of future abuse;" Rejecting "imminent danger" standard for RO renewal - objective fear of further abuse is sufficient; Trial court does not have the power to terminate firearm ownership restrictions that follow from issuance of a DVRO

Restraining Orders

Was this resource helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!