Keith R. v. Superior Court of Orange County (2009)

Case
June 5, 2009
Description

Custody granted by DVRO is not a final custody order; When custody orders were DVRO and an interim custody order, trial court should have assessed a move-away request under the "best interests" standard (for modifying interim orders) instead of the "changed circumstances" standard (for final orders); Father restrained by DVRO must be allowed to present evidence rebutting the §3044 presumption against custody; Peremptory writ in first instance is appropriate remedy

Appeals & Writs
Tags: Writs,
Custody/Visitation
Restraining Orders

Was this resource helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!