Nirschl v. Schiller (2023)

May 10, 2023

Holding that the statements were not protected speech under the anti-SLAPP statute since litigation was not then threatened or seriously contemplated because while every termination of employment may trigger a later lawsuit, the mere possibility of future litigation is insufficient to make negotiations about the terms of the termination protected pre-litigation speech.

Courts & Hearings

Was this resource helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!