O’Gara v. St. Germain (2017)

O'Gara was the restrained party in a DVRO protecting St. Germain; St. Germain reported a possible DVRO violation to the police, who arrested O'Gara - charges ultimately dismissed; O'Gara sued St. Germain over the incorrect report; Trial court denied St. Germain's anti-SLAPP motion; Appeals court reversed denial, concluding that O'Gara's claims all arose from St. Germain's protected petitioning activity