• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Family Violence Appellate Project

Giving survivors a second chance at justice

Giving survivors a second chance at justice Donate




En Español
用中文(表達
In English
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
    • Who We Are
    • Annual Reports & Financials
    • Our Commitment to Race Equity
  • Survivor Stories
  • News
    • Announcements
    • Press Room
    • Battle of the Bands
  • Resources
    • California
      • FVAP Legal Resource Library – California
      • Cases You Can Use – California
      • Other Resources You Can Use – California
    • Washington
      • FVAP Legal Resource Library – Washington
      • Cases You Can Use – Washington
      • Other Resources You Can Use – Washington
    • National
  • Get Involved
    • Donate
      • Herma Hill Kay Memorial Fund
    • Volunteer
    • Clerks/Fellows
    • Job Openings
  • Contact Us

CA Legal Vicory! Renee A. v. Robert A.

April 25, 2023 by FVAP

In this case, our client (Renee) had a child with the opposing party (Robert) after dating.  Robert subjected Renee to harassment and disturbed her peace, including through racist and sexually degrading comments regarding Renee’s friends of color.  Robert’s harassment also targeted the parties’ child.  Renee obtained a DVRO against Robert, but the court refused to modify a prior joint custody order, because it found an “exception” to the Family Code section 3044 rebuttable presumption against awarding custody to an adjudicated abuser like Robert.  The trial court also failed to rule on Renee’s request for child support, which she made as part of her DVRO request but, representing herself at trial, did not know to bring up on her own.  On appeal, the Court of Appeal agreed with both of our arguments: the trial court erred by failing to apply Family Code section 3044, as there are no exceptions to the statutory presumption; and the trial court erred by failing to rule on Renee’s child support request, which effectively denied it, because the court has to decide the support issue even if a party does not bring it up during the hearing, because Family Code section 6341 puts the duty on the trial court.  FVAP successfully co-counseled this case with Sidley Austin LLP.
The appellate court’s unpublished opinion can be found here.

Filed Under: announcements, Uncategorized

Footer

Website Privacy

Policy here
California Office
Helpline: (510) 380-6243
Business line: (510) 858-7358
Email: info@fvaplaw.org

Washington Office
Direct line: (360) 680-1030
Email: infoWA@fvaplaw.org

Website By

Sign Up for Updates

Free, full-service interpretation & translation services available. Servicios gratuitos y completos de traducción e interpretación disponibles. 我们能够提供免费的翻译服务

We serve everyone regardless of immigration status. No rechazamos el servicio basado en el estado de inmigración. 無論您的移民身份如何,我們都將為您服務.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

COVID-19 update: While FVAP is open and our services continue to be available, as of March 9, 2020, in order to ensure the safety and well-being of clients and FVAP staff, we are meeting with visitors only by appointment until further notice. Our helpline is (510) 380-6243, and our business line is (510) 858-7358. You may also email us at info@fvaplaw.org.
Leave Site

Copyright Family Violence Appellate Project 2022