FVAP believes in reproductive rights and privacy. We believe in all persons’ rights to autonomy over their bodies and to make their own choices in healthcare decisions. Reproductive choice deeply impacts survivors of sexual assault and intimate partner violence, which can result in unwanted pregnancies. We know that domestic violence markedly increases during pregnancy, making pregnancy a particularly dangerous time for abuse survivors. FVAP recently supported a policy that helped clarify California’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act, recognizing that reproductive coercion is a form of domestic abuse.
Reproductive coercion is one type of power and control where one partner strips the other of the ability to control their own reproductive system and timeline. It’s important to understand that reproductive coercion, rape-related pregnancy and domestic violence all intersect. A November 2021 study, the first of its kind in the U.S., found that pregnant women die by homicide more frequently than from pregnancy related health conditions. In fact, homicide is the number one cause of death for pregnant women in this country. The number increases for pregnant Black women and pregnant young women. Sadly, most of these women are killed by their partners. In other words, pregnancy increases a person’s chance of being killed by a partner. This is why FVAP remains committed to supporting policy that protects survivors of gender-based and intimate partner violence. We will continue to stand with our communities in solidarity and seek justice through our legal system.
Announcements
Pride 2022
FVAP Honors Juneteenth
Request for Proposal: Web Designer/Developer for Legal Resource Library
Victory for Survivors in Custody Cases with DV
In this case, our client, Mother, got a domestic violence restraining order against Father after he physically abused her and refused to return their young son to her, requiring law enforcement to get involved. The family court gave Mother sole legal and physical custody, but left in place a visitation schedule giving Father three days a week and Mother four. Since this basically gave Father joint custody of the child for about 43% of the time, the family court was first supposed to see if Father had overcome the presumption against granting him custody, under Family Code section 3044, by analyzing the law’s seven factors in writing or on the record. Since the family court did not do that, the appellate court reversed the visitation order, and sent the case back to the family court to follow the law. In addition, the appellate court said the family court didn’t follow the law by refusing to give a “statement of decision,” which Mother had requested at trial, under Family Code section 3022.3. This is the first published opinion under Family Code section 3022.3.
Monica Katz LaBoskey
Deputy Director
Pronouns: she/her/hers
Monica Katz LaBoskey is the Deputy Director of Family Violence Appellate Project. Before joining FVAP, Monica was the Managing Attorney – East Bay of Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach. In addition to her management duties at APILO, she represented survivors of domestic violence in Family Court and received her California Domestic Violence Counselor certification through Asian Women’s Shelter. Prior to that, Monica spent more than ten years in private practice, litigating cases in state and federal courts.
Monica is actively involved in the community and serves on the Board of Directors of Oakland Interfaith Gospel Choir. She volunteers with her alma maters. She completed Bachelors of Arts in African and African American Studies, Italian Studies, and Politics at Brandeis University; received her Juris Doctor from Northeastern University School of Law; and, holds a Certificate in Nonprofit Executive Leadership from IUPUI Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
September 2023
We are pleased to announce that Monica has been selected to participate in OneJustice’s Executive Fellowship program. The program delivers graduate-level nonprofit management content through an intensive multi-modal peer-based model. We are excited for Monica to build on her passion for organizational stability and infrastructure and apply her learnings to help FVAP succeed through its second decade and beyond.
Victory for Survivors Seeking Restraining Order Renewals
FVAP successfully obtained publication of a new case! In this case, the survivor requested to renew a restraining order against her former husband but the trial court denied the request. The survivor appealed the denial and the Court of Appeal reversed the denial because the trial court made an error by only considering whether the former husband committed acts of domestic violence during a narrow window of time when the original restraining order was in effect, and not whether the survivor had a reasonable fear of future abuse. The case has been sent back to the trial court for them to properly apply the law.