• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Family Violence Appellate Project

Giving survivors a second chance at justice

Giving survivors a second chance at justice Donate




En Español
用中文(表達
In English
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
    • Who We Are
    • Annual Reports & Financials
    • Our Commitment to Race Equity
  • Survivor Stories
  • News
    • Announcements
    • Washington Office Closure
    • Court Reporter Shortage Lawsuit
    • Press Room
    • Battle of the Bands
  • Legal Resource Library
    • FVAP’s Online Legal Resource Library
    • National Resources
    • Other Resources
  • Get Involved
    • Donate
      • Herma Hill Kay Memorial Fund
    • Volunteer
    • Clerks and Fellows
    • Job Openings
  • Contact Us

Equal Protection Clause

CA Case Victory! Zachary H. and Teri A (D081250)

November 17, 2023 by FVAP

Zachary H. and Teri A (D081250)

California’s Firearms Restriction under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act Ruled Constitutional. Access to Guns Is A Protected Right for Law Abiding Citizens, not Perpetrators of Domestic Violence

The 4th District Court of Appeal granted our request for partial publication of an opinion on the constitutionality of California’s firearms restriction under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. The court also agreed to use pseudonyms to protect the survivor’s privacy.

First, the case involved a domestic violence restraining order against a mother, which included a prohibition on possessing firearms. The mother argued that a recent Supreme Court decision,  N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen 597 U.S. __ [142 S.Ct. 2111] (Bruen), rendered the firearms restriction unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. However, the court clarified that the firearms prohibition does not violate a restrained party’s Second Amendment right, as the Bruen decision only applies to law-abiding citizens, not individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders.

Second, the opinion also addressed whether an employment exception to the firearms prohibition violated the equal protection clause. The court held that the two groups of individuals, those who need firearms for employment and those who desire firearms for self-protection, are not similarly situated. Even if they were, the court found that the exception is rationally related to the government’s interest in reducing domestic violence. The exception is narrow and limited to specific circumstances, balancing the government’s interest with the economic interests of restrained parties.

Opinion Publication  – This opinion is an order modifying an opinion and certifying it for partial publication. It involves a case between Zachary H. and Teri A. in the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One in California. The opinion also discusses the application of the Second Amendment and equal protection clause in relation to firearms restrictions for individuals subject to restraining orders. 

Footer

Website Privacy

Policy here
California Office
Helpline: (510) 380-6243
Business line: (510) 858-7358
Email: info@fvaplaw.org

Washington Office Closed Effective January 25, 2025

Website By

Sign Up for Updates

Free, full-service interpretation & translation services available. Servicios gratuitos y completos de traducción e interpretación disponibles. 我们能够提供免费的翻译服务

We serve everyone regardless of immigration status. No rechazamos el servicio basado en el estado de inmigración. 無論您的移民身份如何,我們都將為您服務.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

We don’t take walk ins or do in person meetings. Please contact us by phone or email. In California call (510) 380-6243 or email info@fvaplaw.org.
Leave Site

Copyright Family Violence Appellate Project 2025